Soccer

Out of the 3, I'd say you'd head
towards Agger and Cahill, but Agger is so injury prone that Carra would still probably play more.

Sent from my iPhone 4

On 2011-08-13, at 5:40 PM, Edward Crusoe <Edward.Crusoe@btinternet.com> wrote:

> So who gets dropped, Agger or Carragher? You'd have to say Carragher, but
> would Kenny drop him? After all, the only reason I can think of for him keep
> sticking with Spearing is that he is a local lad.
>
> I think the striker situation would be potentially serious with no N'Gog -
> even though I agree that he is next to hopeless.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Thomas
> Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 10:34 PM
> To: lfc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [lfc] Cahill
>
> Cahill would be a really good addition and Ngog basically hopeless. If it
> comes off, worry about a striker later.
>
> Sent from my iPhone 4
>
> On 2011-08-13, at 5:27 PM, Edward Crusoe <Edward.Crusoe@btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I've got no problems with signing Cahill, or getting rid of N'Gog and
> > Shelvey based upon their playing abilities. But it would be extremely odd
> > to
> > sell effectively our only reserve striker (Kuyt is more a midfielder now)
> > without replacing him.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Thomas
> > Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2011 8:45 PM
> > To: LFC List
> > Subject: [lfc] Cahill
> >
> > Catching up on the forum reading, so this may have changed a bit as it's
> > from 11pm last night
> >
> > Apparently LFC have put in a bid for cash plus Ngog. Also Shelvey on loan.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone 4
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]