Re: [lfc] Re: Wickham

The only bright part of, for me, is that we do seem to be drawing a line in the sand with players [Marveaux another = bullet dodged there] and so we should.

The thing is hopefully the end package of who we get will determine whether it's been a successful window. Personally the targets that we are getting mentioned with are somewhat underwhelming. I've also got a sneaking suspicion that FSG are insisting that we offload a fair number of players and we don't seem to be getting rid of any of the deadwood at all and maybe that's holding up things. Hopefully not, because we may not sign any more if that's the case.

Personally, I would have rather seen us blow the budget on 1 or 2 players only that would make a major impact on the team.


On 2011-06-29, at 9:32 AM, andym2210 wrote:

> At £8M I would agree but I guess he wasnt a top priority for us.
>
> Where does this leave the Ngog deal - do Sunderland need another young unproven striker?
>
> --- In lfc@yahoogroups.com, Bill Thomas <anfield@...> wrote:
> >
> > Confirmed to Sunderland......mistake me thinks.
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lfc/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lfc/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
lfc-digest@yahoogroups.com
lfc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
lfc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment