Re: [lfc] Re: FT TV EW

 

That was quite logical and informative.

Exactly what are you doing on this list? :)

Honestly though, informative.

Best Regards,

SK

--- On Mon, 28/2/11, Tor Elverum <anfield_the@yahoo.no> wrote:

From: Tor Elverum <anfield_the@yahoo.no>
Subject: Re: [lfc] Re: FT TV EW
To: lfc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 28 February, 2011, 7:47 PM

 

Don't thinkthis is a big mystery at all. The pace of yesterday's football was

much lower. Half the players (or more) would stand still at a particular point

in time, causing less tired muscles. An injury like the one Kelly got yesterday

is more likely to occur when the muscles are either tired or not warmed up.

Also, I don't think you needed to be really fast to beat a regular FB in your

heyday.

But weight training can of course increase the likelyhood of pulling a muscle,

it's just a case of a muscle being to strong for it's own good. (Proper and

balanced weight training can reduce the likelyhood - I'm sure that's one of the

main tasks the medical and physical team are working on at Melwood). If you want

a player that's not likely to pull a hamstring, look for players like Kuyt.

Can't beat a man, can't pull a muscle.

Btw, if you've first pulled a muscle, you're more likely to pull it again as

when a muscle repairs itself, some of the tissue will "grow across" the fibers,

making the muscle less flexible.

Tor

________________________________

From: Bill Thomas <anfield@me.com>

I just think if you over develop muscles like the hamstrings. They're more

likely to ping. Just an opinion and it's just that you never used to hear of

hamstring injuries years ago....something is obviously causing it to the point

so many players get them.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment