Re: [lfc] Barton

 

For once I find myself agreeing with everything Colin says! :o

On 27 May 2011 22:53, "Colin Rowlands" <crowlands@rim.com> wrote:
>>Personally I think it could just work. Back in the good old days (tm) we
always had a core of tough players and I think we've been missing a nasty
edge. Plus he's been well behaved for a while now and even more importantly
is still a good player.
>>
>
> I seem to remember that being considered as a fault in the pass and then
we had the idiocy of some of souness' signings.
>
> Well behaved in the sense of not being in prison in the last couple of
years or not punched anyone while playing for a few months?
>
>
>>I don't imagine this would be a popular signing but am interested in how
others would see it?
>>
>
> I think it could be a horrendous signing that could easily end up ranking
alongside those of pfk or poulsen, he is not good enough a player, is a
liability to a team with yellows and reds and is too old too.
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Research In Motion Deutschland GmbH
> Unter den Linden 21, 10117 Berlin. Handelsregister: Amtsgericht
Charlottenburg HRB 88761
> Geschäftsführung: James Balsillie, Tessa Louise Smillie.
Umsatzsteuernummer DE 813826348
>
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
information, privileged material (including material protected by the
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

0 comments:

Post a Comment