Soccer: Re: [lfc] NESV's axe

Re: [lfc] NESV's axe

Posted by soccer |

I just posted this on a forum with the subject "NESV and their strategy" where it's maybe 50-50 on what they are doing.

I'm very apprehensive about them and am getting concerned. That said I do agree with those that say they may be quietly moving behind the scenes and lets hope so. My level of concern will certainly elevate dramatically should Roy still not get fired if another defeat or draw occurs today. It's fine having someone lined up to take over before you can Hodgson, but I think a temporary/interim manager is far better......this needs dealing with quickly.

On 2010-12-31, at 3:23 PM, guiseppemiguel@gmail.com wrote:

> If by "quickly followed" he means one full season. Grady Little lasted long enough to make one of the biggest managerial mistakes in Red Sox history, leaving in exhausted starting pitcher Pedro Martinez to blow a big lead in the decisive Game 7 of the 2003 American League Championship Series.
>
> We all know he should go, but it's pretty clear Woy, barring a complete and utter disaster of unimaginable proportions, is going to get the full season before being replaced.
>
> I'm sure they already have potential replacements in mind.
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Deacon <jrd@star.ucl.ac.uk>
> Sender: lfc@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:09:50
> To: <lfc@yahoogroups.com>
> Reply-To: lfc@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [lfc] NESV's axe
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2010, Keith Anderson wrote:
>
> > A mate who follows baseball, and in particular the Yankees, tells me
> > when NESV took over the Red Sox, the first person to go was the GM and
> > he was quickly followed by the coach...
>
> we can only hope...
>
> i desparately can't want us to lose but i'm almost in that position coming
> in to the Bolton game. if we can't beat Wolves at home we're almost
> odds-on to lose against Bolton who have a manager not afraid to attack and
> who has rejuvenated their side. of course, a team that comes and has a go
> should help us because we won't have to try our inept attempts to break
> down a 9-man defense. if we win it'll be good for us but unfortunately
> also good for the clown in charge.
>
> you have to believe that if we got 2 points or less from the next two
> league games, and a thumping by the Mancs in the Cup and he'd have to go
> but i have the feeling that he isn't going to do the honourable thing so
> it's up to the board to sack him. the question is will they...?
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>