Isn't that what's happening with Fabregas? I could be wrong, but he doesn't have many years left on his contract i believe. Wenger of course is in a position to value the player's impact on the field over the residual value of any potential sale and he probably feels that Fabregas wouldn't sign a renewal anyway so he probably just wants to use as much of Fabregas' influence on the pitch as far as possible.
--- On Sun, 29/8/10, Keith Anderson <Anfield@aol.com> wrote:
From: Keith Anderson <Anfield@aol.com>
Subject: [lfc] Re: Re: Fee agreed for Mach with Barcelona
To: lfc@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, 29 August, 2010, 8:24 PM
We could and one day I'd like to see a club make a player honour the lucrative contract he signed. Alas, I think with the over inflated transfer market, clubs would rather sell than lose the millions in income from getting rid of a player who wants to leave. Maybe in hindsight we should have let Mascherano go last summer when his value was higher...
Keith
On Aug 29, 2010, at 1:14 AM, lfc@yahoogroups.com wrote:
> Re: Fee agreed for Mach with Barcelona
> Posted by: "Ilker Guresun" ilkerlfc@yahoo.co.uk ilkerlfc
> Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:04 am (PDT)
>
>
>
> Just outof curiosity. What would have happened if we just said "no. we
> are not going to sell you no matter what they offer." Can't a club
> keep a player against his wish?
>
> ilker
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
0 comments:
Post a Comment